{
 "@context": "https://csoai.org/llm-context.json",
 "type": "LLMPageSummary",
 "url": "https://csoai.org/ai-act-summary.html",
 "title": "AI Act summary — one-page EU AI Act overview | CSOAI",
 "description": "AI Act summary: the EU",
 "headings": [
  "AI Act summary — one page",
  "Structure (10 chapters, 11 annexes)",
  "Risk classes",
  "Article 50 (the one most users feel)",
  "Conformity routes",
  "Dates",
  "What CSOAI measures"
 ],
 "text": "AI Act summary — one-page EU AI Act overview | CSOAI Home EU AI Act Products Docs AI Act summary — one page A short, opinionated summary of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689. Not legal advice. For the full text, see the Official Journal . A more detailed walk is on the EU AI Act hub . Structure (10 chapters, 11 annexes) Chapters I–II — general provisions, scope, definitions, prohibited practices (Article 5). Chapter III — high-risk AI systems (Article 6 onwards, Annex III). Strict requirements on data, documentation, transparency, human oversight, accuracy, robustness, cybersecurity. Chapter IV — transparency obligations for providers and deployers of certain AI systems (Article 50). Limited-risk class. Chapters V–VII — governance (AI Office, national competent authorities), conformity assessment (Article 43 internal-control, notified bodies), post-market monitoring. Annexes I–IV — technical documentation requirements (Annex IV), conformity assessment procedures (Annex VII), high-risk use cases (Annex III), internal-control eligibility thresholds (Annex VI). Risk classes Unacceptable risk — Article 5 prohibited practices. Social scoring, real-time biometric identification in public spaces (limited exceptions), untargeted facial scraping, predictive policing on profiling alone, emotion inference in the workplace, biometric categorisation inferring sensitive attributes. High risk — Annex III systems + safety components under Article 6(1). 8 categories: biometrics, critical infrastructure, education, employment, essential services, law enforcement, migration, justice. Limited risk — Article 50 transparency obligations. Chatbot disclosure, deepfake marking, synthetic content marking, biometric / emotion disclosure. Minimal risk — no specific obligations. Voluntary codes of conduct encouraged. Article 50 (the one most users feel) Article 50 covers limited-risk AI systems that interact with people, generate or manipulate content, or read emotions / biometrics. The obligations are: Art 50(1) — chatbot disclosure. Users must know they're talking to an AI. Art 50(2) — synthetic content marking in a machine-readable way. Art 50(3) — deepfake disclosure. Art 50(4) — synthetic text published to inform the public must be marked. Art 50(5) — biometric / emotion inference disclosure. Fines: up to 3% of global annual turnover or €15M, whichever is higher. Conformity routes Article 43 internal-control — most Annex III systems can self-assess. The Article 43 route requires credible self-assessment evidence (frozen harness, deterministic execution, signed artefacts, corpus-watch). See Article 43, with evidence . Notified body — for some Annex III systems and Article 6(1) safety components, third-party assessment by a notified body is required. CSOAI is not a notified body. Dates Entered force: 1 August 2024. Article 5 prohibited practices: 2 February 2025. General-purpose AI obligations: 2 August 2025. Most obligations (including high-risk, Article 50): 2 August 2026 . Embedded high-risk systems in regulated products: 2 August 2027. What CSOAI measures EU AI Act hub — the per-Article walk. ProvBench — Article 50 provenance survival, measured. Article 50 Passport — free signed transparency record in 2 minutes. Article 43 internal-control route — what makes a self-assessment credible. CSOAI Ltd · UK company 16939677 · Every published figure traces to a signed, verifiable record.",
 "text_truncated": false,
 "register": {
  "role": "measurement_and_attestation_support",
  "csoai_certifies_systems": false,
  "csoai_is_a_notified_body": false,
  "csoai_has_enforcement_powers": false,
  "note": "CSOAI measures and publishes evidence. It issues no conformity marks and holds no accreditation. Nothing here is certification or legal advice."
 },
 "generated_by": "make_llm_json.py"
}