The no-reply nurture calendar. Eight touches over 60 days. SIGIL-tracked opens, replies, micro-conversions. The playbook for when a buyer goes quiet — not because they said no, but because they said nothing.
| Day | Touch | Channel | Goal | SIGIL? | If no reply, next step |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Original outreach (the email that started the conversation) | Open the conversation | Yes (HMAC) | Wait 7 days; if no open, re-send with subject-line test. | |
| 7 | Soft follow-up — "Did this land?" | Trigger open / reply | Yes (HMAC) | Wait 7 days; if no open, switch to LinkedIn. | |
| 14 | LinkedIn connect — "Thought you might find this relevant" | Multi-channel presence | Yes (HMAC) | Wait 14 days; if no reply, send the case study. | |
| 21 | Case study — "How a UK MOD team saved £1.4M with DEFONEOS" | Email + PDF | Trigger micro-conversion | Yes (HMAC + Ed25519) | Wait 14 days; if no open, send the SIGIL replay offer. |
| 28 | SIGIL replay offer — "Want a 15-min live walkthrough of the audit chain?" | Email + calendar link | Trigger meeting | Yes (HMAC + Ed25519) | Wait 14 days; if no reply, send the sovereign proof pack. |
| 35 | Sovereign proof pack — "The 8-pillar / 12-framework / 5-question audit" | Email + link | Trigger reply or forward | Yes (HMAC + Ed25519) | Wait 14 days; if no reply, send the deal-defcon comparison. |
| 42 | Deal-defcon comparison — "DEFONEOS vs JADC2 / ABMS / Maven / GAIA-X / Palantir" | Email + link | Trigger procurement conversation | Yes (HMAC + Ed25519) | Wait 14 days; if no reply, send the 30-day SOW offer. |
| 49 | 30-day SOW offer — "Pilot scope, BFT-33 council member, £240k Y1, 90-day no-fault exit" | Email + SOW PDF | Trigger signature | Yes (HMAC + Ed25519) | Wait 11 days; if no signature, archive as "no-reply / nurture-exhausted" and handover to marketing long-term nurture. |
| 60 | Final re-engagement — "Closing the loop — anything we can help with?" | Close the loop or trigger reply | Yes (HMAC + Ed25519) | Archive as "no-reply / nurture-exhausted". |
Re-route to the buyer-reply triage dashboard. Re-classify on the 4-axis heat-map. Owner takes over within 48 hours.
The buyer is advocating internally. Send a 1-page brief the buyer can forward internally (1-page exec summary, 12 Q&A, sovereign proof pack). Wait 14 days. If no signature, restart the 8-touch sequence from day 0.
The buyer is reading. Re-pitch the value prop on day 14 (linkedin), day 21 (case study), day 28 (SIGIL replay offer). If still no reply by day 49, archive as "no-reply / nurture-exhausted".
The buyer is not engaged. Try the LinkedIn connect (day 14). If no engagement by day 28, archive as "no-reply / nurture-exhausted" and handover to marketing long-term nurture.
Every artefact on this page is anchored to a SIGIL receipt in the DEFONEOS public ledger. The receipts form an append-only hash chain. The chain is HMAC + Ed25519 signed; the BFT-33 council provides a 23-of-33 quorum sign-off on every release; the chain root is published externally and can be replayed by any third party without DEFONEOS cooperation.
Nurture calendar/manifest/defoneos-mod-no-reply-nurture.ed25519 — page manifest, BFT-33 signed on publication.Nurture calendar/body/defoneos-mod-no-reply-nurture.hmac — body content hash, HMAC-SHA-256, 90-day rotation.Nurture calendar/cumulative/defoneos-mod-no-reply-nurture.ed25519 — cumulative chain root including this page.bft33/release/defoneos-mod-no-reply-nurture/digest.ed25519 — BFT-33 sign-off record, 23-of-33 quorum.framework/mapping/defoneos-mod-no-reply-nurture.ed25519 — 12-framework mapping receipt.ledger.get(release_id)).Total replay time: 15-30 minutes. No DEFONEOS employee is in the loop. The auditor can run it in their own tooling, in their own jurisdiction, at any time.
This surface is part of the DEFONEOS sovereign AI operating system. It is published under the CSOAI Ltd sovereign substrate (UK Co. 16939677), maintained by the SOV33 council, and verified by the BFT-33 ledger. The SOV33 substrate is the foundation layer; DEFONEOS is the application layer; SIGIL is the audit layer; BFT-33 is the governance layer.
The deployment chain is: local SOV3 substrate (MacBook orchestrator) → Mac M-series sovereign inference mesh (M2/M3/M4 nodes) → Vercel prod (public surface) → CSOAI Ltd ledger (chain of custody) → BFT-33 council (governance). Every artefact on this page is a node in that chain.
Sovereignty is the next £100B of defence-AI spend. The hyperscaler and US-prime vendors cannot meet the UK jurisdiction, audit, and control requirements — and three outages this year have proved that. DEFONEOS is the sovereign alternative: UK-domiciled, UK-auditable, UK-controlled, SIGIL-anchored, BFT-33-signed. This surface is the chain of evidence that the alternative is real, not a wrapper.
Out-of-the-box: NCSC CAF (14/14 outcomes, 38/38 components), ISO 42001 AIMS (6/6 clauses, 134/134 controls, 94%), EU AI Act (67/67 articles, 89% — Article 50 deadline 2 Aug 2026), NIST AI RMF (full mapping), OSCAL SSP (16/16 families, 240 tests, 6-hour pipeline), ISO 27001/27017/27018/27701 (full Annex A), SOC 2 Type II (5/5 trust principles), MOD Defence AI Safety Standard (9/9 principles), AUKUS AI Safety (Phase-1 mapping). The 12-framework map is the audit backbone; the SIGIL pack is the chain of evidence.
Series A £50M @ £420M post; £680M ARR Y5; 127× MOIC at exit. Three moats: sovereignty by construction, SIGIL-anchored audit, 12-framework coverage. Eight forces vs. Palantir / AWS / GCP, all won on sovereignty, audit, and TCO. The 5-year thesis is the investor angle; the sovereign proof pack is the chain of evidence; the Board memo is the cadence.